This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:    87176
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:    59696

Total number of variables............................:    25615
                     variables with only lower bounds:       15
                variables with lower and upper bounds:        0
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:    25592
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:    25592
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:        0

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0  0.0000000e+00 7.55e+03 1.00e+00 1.00e-02  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1  2.8532251e-11 7.55e+03 3.91e-03 6.95e-07  -1.0     -   1.00e-09  4  1h
   2  1.3709746e+04 7.39e+03 6.77e-02 2.44e-07  -1.0   -4.0  2.19e-02  2  1h
   3  2.3332160e+05 6.87e+03 2.92e-01 1.34e-07  -1.0   -4.5  7.06e-02  2  1h
   4  7.3478979e+05 6.32e+03 1.32e-01 9.00e-08  -1.0   -5.0  7.98e-02  2  1h
   5  7.4996627e+05 6.31e+03 9.28e-02 7.05e-08  -1.0   -5.4  2.11e-03  2  1h
   6  1.2594014e+06 5.92e+03 2.68e-01 7.00e-08  -1.0   -5.9  6.13e-02  2  1h
   7  2.4811997e+07 8.60e+01 3.74e+00 1.05e-07  -1.0   -6.4  1.00e+00  2  1h
   8  2.0306407e+07 1.65e+01 3.95e-01 6.45e-08  -1.0   -6.9  8.57e-01  2  1h
   9  1.9746330e+07 2.58e-01 3.89e-03 8.02e-07  -1.0   -7.3  1.00e+00  2  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10  1.9746525e+07 2.97e-05 7.68e-05 6.41e-08  -1.7   -7.8  1.00e+00  1  1h
  11  1.9746525e+07 3.95e-12 3.40e-05 1.28e-07  -5.7   -8.3  1.00e+00  1  1h
  12  1.9746525e+07 4.35e-12 1.38e-05 1.08e-07  -5.7   -8.8  1.00e+00  1  1f
  13  1.9746525e+07 4.16e-12 4.69e-05 8.87e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00 10  1f
  14  1.9746525e+07 5.37e-12 3.77e-05 8.51e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  6  1f
  15  1.9746525e+07 4.14e-12 8.31e-05 6.27e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  4  1f
  16  1.9746525e+07 4.17e-12 2.69e-05 2.82e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  7  1f
  17  1.9746525e+07 4.15e-12 4.33e-06 8.37e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  5  1f
  18  1.9746525e+07 4.60e-12 1.93e-07 2.88e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00 10  1h
  19  1.9746525e+07 4.33e-12 6.59e-09 2.32e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  9  1h

Number of Iterations....: 19

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:   1.9746525315219373e+07    1.9746525315219373e+07
Dual infeasibility......:   6.5919724939407034e-09    6.5919724939407034e-09
Constraint violation....:   4.3295323093276934e-12    4.3295323093276934e-12
Complementarity.........:   2.3201781523969365e-09    2.3201781523969365e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   6.5919724939407034e-09    6.5919724939407034e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 20
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 20
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 20
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 20
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 19
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 30
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 84

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.163 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.109 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.008 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.091 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.370 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).