This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:     1915
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:     4403

Total number of variables............................:       72
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:       42
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:      142
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:       60
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:       82

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0  5.8617450e+02 3.93e-01 1.00e+02 1.50e+00  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1  5.8617455e+02 3.93e-01 1.40e-02 1.16e-04  -1.0   -4.0  1.18e-07  1  1h
   2  5.6598303e+02 3.65e-02 6.41e-03 9.17e-05  -1.7   -4.5  1.00e+00  1  1h
   3  5.7389233e+02 4.65e-03 4.41e-03 5.67e-05  -2.5   -5.0  8.73e-01  1  1h
   4  5.7391420e+02 4.52e-03 3.54e-01 5.10e-05  -3.8     -   2.72e-02  9  1h
   5  5.7409766e+02 6.47e-03 3.77e-01 4.82e-05  -3.8   -5.4  4.90e-01  1  1h
   6  5.7505500e+02 4.58e-03 5.57e-01 4.57e-05  -3.8   -4.1  4.63e-01  2  1h
   7  5.7607157e+02 2.50e-03 9.78e-01 4.74e-05  -3.8     -   6.27e-01  5  1h
   8  5.7674731e+02 6.05e-04 1.16e+00 2.28e-05  -3.8     -   8.58e-01  6  1h
   9  5.7689151e+02 1.46e-04 1.69e-03 1.15e-05  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  4  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10  5.7689486e+02 2.17e-06 7.82e-05 3.54e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  5  1h
  11  5.7689251e+02 4.36e-06 9.33e-01 1.83e-05  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  12  5.7689244e+02 7.15e-07 1.33e-03 8.47e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  13  5.7689244e+02 3.13e-08 8.55e-05 2.29e-06  -5.7   -2.8  1.00e+00  3  1h
  14  5.7689242e+02 1.65e-10 4.99e-07 1.85e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  15  5.7689237e+02 4.11e-09 2.38e-01 5.38e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  16  5.7689231e+02 2.99e-12 7.41e-02 1.23e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  17  5.7689230e+02 7.50e-14 1.37e-02 3.05e-08  -8.6   -2.3  1.00e+00  1  1h
  18  5.7689230e+02 2.66e-14 1.35e-03 7.26e-09  -8.6   -2.8  1.00e+00  1  1h
  19  5.7689230e+02 2.26e-14 2.42e-12 3.20e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h

Number of Iterations....: 19

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:   1.1894686659445139e+02    5.7689230298308928e+02
Dual infeasibility......:   2.4226181346259991e-12    1.1749697952936097e-11
Constraint violation....:   2.2623613052386027e-14    2.2623613052386027e-14
Complementarity.........:   6.6049686835658254e-10    3.2034098115294255e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   3.2034098115294255e-09    3.2034098115294255e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 20
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 20
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 20
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 20
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 19
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 32
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 53

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.015 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.027 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.006 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.030 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.079 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).