This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:       14
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:      564

Total number of variables............................:       10
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:        0
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:        3
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:        3
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:        0

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0 -2.1014539e+01 1.30e+00 3.65e+00 1.98e-08  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1 -2.1014542e+01 1.30e+00 1.72e-02 1.00e-06  -1.0    2.0  1.00e-07  1  2h
   2 -9.2188090e+01 3.05e+00 1.09e-02 1.00e-06  -1.0    1.5  1.00e+00  1  1h
   3 -5.7834773e+01 8.56e-01 2.28e-03 1.00e-06  -1.0    2.9  1.00e+00  2  1h
   4 -4.6763648e+01 1.32e-01 4.82e-03 1.00e-06  -1.7    2.4  1.00e+00  1  1h
   5 -4.5092958e+01 4.06e-03 2.09e-03 1.00e-06  -2.5     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   6 -4.5053454e+01 4.88e-05 1.16e-02 1.00e-06  -3.8    1.9  1.00e+00  1  1h
   7 -2.1802309e+02 5.82e+00 2.25e-01 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1f
   8 -1.0183480e+02 1.82e+00 1.77e-01 1.00e-06  -3.8    1.4  1.00e+00  2  1h
   9 -6.0779176e+01 4.64e-01 8.97e-02 1.00e-06  -3.8    0.9  1.00e+00  2  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10 -4.9175035e+01 6.71e-02 2.03e-02 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  11 -4.7916748e+01 9.07e-03 9.33e-04 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  12 -4.9240238e+01 5.42e-02 1.05e-03 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  13 -4.8116288e+01 1.35e-02 3.31e-04 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  14 -4.7869592e+01 4.04e-03 8.54e-05 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  15 -4.7783029e+01 8.28e-04 1.33e-05 1.00e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  16 -4.7763121e+01 8.35e-05 1.05e-04 1.04e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  17 -4.7761267e+01 7.74e-06 1.28e-05 9.99e-07  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  18 -4.7761095e+01 1.77e-07 3.60e-07 1.40e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h
  19 -4.7761091e+01 9.15e-11 1.92e-07 2.93e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  20 -4.7761091e+01 2.79e-16 1.17e-13 2.90e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h

Number of Iterations....: 20

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:  -4.7761091232212777e+01   -4.7761091232212777e+01
Dual infeasibility......:   1.1723955140041653e-13    1.1723955140041653e-13
Constraint violation....:   2.7870400857796585e-16    2.7870400857796585e-16
Complementarity.........:   2.9018011701603073e-09    2.9018011701603073e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   2.9018011701603073e-09    2.9018011701603073e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 22
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 21
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 22
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 21
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 20
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 32
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 40

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.021 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.020 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.004 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.031 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.076 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).