This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:       14
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:      564

Total number of variables............................:       10
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:       10
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:        3
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:        3
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:        0

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0 -2.1014539e+01 1.30e+00 3.65e+00 1.02e+02  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1 -2.1014542e+01 1.30e+00 5.56e-02 2.66e-04  -1.0    2.0  1.00e-07  1  2h
   2 -9.2188031e+01 3.05e+00 3.50e-02 9.98e-06  -1.0    1.5  1.00e+00  1  1h
   3 -5.7834764e+01 8.56e-01 7.36e-03 4.33e-06  -1.0    2.9  1.00e+00  1  1h
   4 -4.6763643e+01 1.32e-01 1.55e-02 4.40e-06  -1.7    2.4  1.00e+00  1  1h
   5 -4.5092950e+01 4.06e-03 6.74e-03 4.35e-06  -2.5     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   6 -4.5053446e+01 4.88e-05 3.74e-02 4.34e-06  -3.8    1.9  1.00e+00  1  1h
   7 -2.1803173e+02 5.82e+00 7.25e-01 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1f
   8 -1.0183791e+02 1.82e+00 5.69e-01 4.33e-06  -3.8    1.4  1.00e+00  2  1h
   9 -6.0780187e+01 4.64e-01 2.89e-01 4.33e-06  -3.8    0.9  1.00e+00  2  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10 -4.9175218e+01 6.71e-02 6.56e-02 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  11 -4.7916752e+01 9.07e-03 3.01e-03 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  12 -4.9240805e+01 5.42e-02 3.38e-03 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  13 -4.8116431e+01 1.35e-02 1.07e-03 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  14 -4.7869644e+01 4.05e-03 2.75e-04 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  15 -4.7783044e+01 8.28e-04 4.30e-05 4.33e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  3  1h
  16 -4.7763123e+01 8.36e-05 1.33e-04 2.37e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  17 -4.7761267e+01 7.75e-06 1.63e-05 1.85e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  18 -4.7761095e+01 1.77e-07 3.60e-07 1.40e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h
  19 -4.7761091e+01 9.18e-11 1.92e-07 2.93e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  20 -4.7761091e+01 1.65e-16 1.95e-14 2.90e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h

Number of Iterations....: 20

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:  -4.7761091232212792e+01   -4.7761091232212792e+01
Dual infeasibility......:   1.9539925233402755e-14    1.9539925233402755e-14
Constraint violation....:   1.6538937357110649e-16    1.6538937357110649e-16
Complementarity.........:   2.9018011704600767e-09    2.9018011704600767e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   2.9018011704600767e-09    2.9018011704600767e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 22
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 21
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 22
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 21
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 20
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 32
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 39

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.014 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.018 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.004 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.029 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.065 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).