This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:      360
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:      486

Total number of variables............................:      162
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:      115
                     variables with only upper bounds:       47
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:       63
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:       63
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:        0

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0  1.0384608e+03 3.51e+03 9.80e-01 8.42e+06  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1  1.0384608e+03 3.51e+03 1.56e+01 8.42e+06  -1.0     -   1.66e-07  1  1h
   2  1.0384608e+03 3.51e+03 4.53e+02 2.25e+03  -1.0     -   1.08e-07  1  2h
   3  1.0544701e+03 1.59e+03 2.37e+02 1.18e+03  -1.0   -4.0  5.46e-01  1  1h
   4  1.0625135e+03 1.20e+03 2.01e+01 1.00e+02  -1.0   -4.5  2.47e-01  1  1h
   5  1.0926070e+03 2.18e-08 1.59e+00 7.91e+00  -1.0   -5.0  1.00e+00  1  1h
   6  1.0878938e+03 9.46e-10 2.50e-02 1.24e-01  -1.0   -5.4  1.00e+00  1  1f
   7  1.0853306e+03 1.17e-09 2.34e-02 1.17e-01  -2.5   -5.9  7.37e-01  1  1f
   8  1.0842543e+03 1.02e-09 8.45e-03 4.20e-02  -2.5   -6.4  8.72e-01  1  1f
   9  1.0839359e+03 5.42e-10 3.57e-05 1.79e-04  -2.5   -6.9  1.00e+00  2  1f
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10  1.0838166e+03 7.14e-11 2.45e-04 1.78e-04  -5.7   -6.4  9.84e-01  2  1f
  11  1.0838029e+03 3.27e-11 5.53e-04 3.23e-04  -5.7   -6.9  1.00e+00 10  1f
  12  1.0838000e+03 2.54e-10 1.13e-05 9.14e-05  -5.7   -6.5  1.00e+00 10  1f
  13  1.0837995e+03 4.34e-10 1.36e-05 2.38e-05  -5.7   -6.1  1.00e+00 10  1f
  14  1.0837993e+03 4.01e-10 1.42e-01 7.78e-06  -5.7   -6.5  1.00e+00 10  1f
  15  1.0837992e+03 3.71e-10 8.17e-06 2.83e-06  -5.7   -6.1  1.00e+00 10  1h
  16  1.0837991e+03 5.35e-10 7.69e-01 5.94e-07  -8.6   -4.8  9.99e-01  7  1h
  17  1.0837991e+03 4.54e-10 5.98e-01 7.88e-08  -8.6   -5.3  1.00e+00  4  1f
  18  1.0837991e+03 5.30e-13 1.86e-02 6.25e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  7  1h
  19  1.0837991e+03 2.81e-13 3.57e-12 3.77e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  1  1h

Number of Iterations....: 19

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:   1.0837991233759265e+03    1.0837991233759265e+03
Dual infeasibility......:   3.5709213364043535e-12    3.5709213364043535e-12
Constraint violation....:   2.8124704389586485e-13    2.8124704389586485e-13
Complementarity.........:   3.7658501285554268e-09    3.7658501285554268e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   3.7658501285554268e-09    3.7658501285554268e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 21
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 20
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 21
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 20
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 19
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 40
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 101

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.029 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.060 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.003 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.033 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.125 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).