This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:     1915
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:     4403

Total number of variables............................:       72
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:       42
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:        0
Total number of inequality constraints...............:      142
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:       60
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:       82

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0  5.8617450e+02 3.93e-01 1.00e+02 1.50e+00  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  0  0 
   1  5.8617455e+02 3.93e-01 1.40e-02 1.16e-04  -1.0   -4.0  1.18e-07  1  1h
   2  5.6598303e+02 3.65e-02 6.41e-03 9.17e-05  -1.7   -4.5  1.00e+00  1  1h
   3  5.7389233e+02 4.65e-03 4.41e-03 5.67e-05  -2.5   -5.0  8.73e-01  1  1h
   4  5.7391420e+02 4.52e-03 3.54e-01 5.10e-05  -3.8     -   2.72e-02  7  1h
   5  5.7409767e+02 6.47e-03 3.77e-01 4.82e-05  -3.8   -5.4  4.90e-01  2  1h
   6  5.7505501e+02 4.58e-03 5.57e-01 4.57e-05  -3.8   -5.9  4.63e-01  4  1h
   7  5.7607159e+02 2.50e-03 9.78e-01 4.74e-05  -3.8     -   6.27e-01  7  1h
   8  5.7674863e+02 5.89e-04 1.10e+00 2.27e-05  -3.8   -3.7  8.65e-01 10  1h
   9  5.7689154e+02 1.45e-04 1.72e-03 1.16e-05  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  4  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10  5.7689486e+02 2.21e-06 7.93e-05 3.55e-06  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  4  1h
  11  5.7689281e+02 4.30e-06 9.23e-01 1.84e-05  -5.7   -3.3  1.00e+00 10  1h
  12  5.7689252e+02 7.44e-07 1.34e-03 8.49e-06  -5.7   -2.8  1.00e+00  2  1h
  13  5.7689242e+02 3.36e-08 8.34e-05 2.27e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  14  5.7689242e+02 1.36e-10 4.99e-07 1.85e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  15  5.7689237e+02 4.11e-09 2.38e-01 5.38e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  16  5.7689231e+02 2.96e-12 7.41e-02 1.23e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  17  5.7689230e+02 1.49e-14 1.37e-02 3.05e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  18  5.7689230e+02 2.80e-14 1.35e-03 7.26e-09  -8.6   -3.3  1.00e+00  1  1h
  19  5.7689230e+02 1.61e-14 1.20e-11 3.20e-09  -8.6   -3.8  1.00e+00  1  1h

Number of Iterations....: 19

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:   1.1894686659450531e+02    5.7689230298335076e+02
Dual infeasibility......:   1.1966072823706731e-11    5.8035453194977650e-11
Constraint violation....:   1.6084356069256955e-14    1.6084356069256955e-14
Complementarity.........:   6.6049692076203132e-10    3.2034100656958520e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   3.2034100656958520e-09    3.2034100656958520e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 20
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 20
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 20
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 20
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 19
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 34
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 75

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.013 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.034 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.006 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.028 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.081 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).