This is MadNLP version v0.12.0, running with cuDSS v1.0.0

Number of nonzeros in constraint Jacobian............:     8802
Number of nonzeros in Lagrangian Hessian.............:     5091

Total number of variables............................:     2302
                     variables with only lower bounds:        0
                variables with lower and upper bounds:      300
                     variables with only upper bounds:        0
Total number of equality constraints.................:     2002
Total number of inequality constraints...............:        0
        inequality constraints with only lower bounds:        0
   inequality constraints with lower and upper bounds:        0
        inequality constraints with only upper bounds:        0

iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
   0  0.0000000e+00 1.00e-02 5.88e-04 9.90e-01  -1.0     -   0.00e+00  1  0 
   1 -1.0480389e-02 4.07e-03 3.84e-04 3.88e-02  -1.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   2 -2.9854563e-02 2.45e-02 6.80e-04 5.29e-03  -2.5     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   3 -3.0878878e-02 2.62e-03 3.70e-05 1.21e-03  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   4 -5.1784643e-02 7.78e-02 6.29e-03 7.47e-04  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   5 -4.1725007e-02 7.46e-03 2.66e-04 1.75e-04  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   6 -4.1037389e-02 1.70e-03 1.06e-05 1.52e-04  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   7 -4.0902697e-02 1.77e-06 2.12e-08 1.50e-04  -3.8     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   8 -4.4711274e-02 6.77e-03 1.23e-04 4.52e-05  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
   9 -4.8097632e-02 1.76e-02 1.90e-04 1.35e-05  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  10 -4.7868882e-02 4.79e-03 1.14e-04 4.27e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  11 -4.7880251e-02 4.36e-04 1.55e-05 2.17e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  12 -4.7882211e-02 6.55e-06 3.74e-07 1.85e-06  -5.7     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  13 -4.8040152e-02 1.34e-03 3.51e-05 5.17e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  14 -4.8053042e-02 1.13e-03 5.03e-05 1.52e-07  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  15 -4.8054890e-02 4.40e-04 1.20e-05 4.60e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  16 -4.8055297e-02 2.77e-04 7.51e-06 1.34e-08  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  17 -4.8055374e-02 6.60e-05 1.76e-06 4.53e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  18 -4.8055383e-02 6.29e-06 1.86e-07 2.63e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
  19 -4.8055383e-02 3.07e-08 1.21e-09 2.51e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h
iter    objective    inf_pr   inf_du inf_compl lg(mu) lg(rg) alpha_pr ir ls
  20 -4.8055383e-02 2.65e-12 1.06e-13 2.51e-09  -8.6     -   1.00e+00  2  1h

Number of Iterations....: 20

                                   (scaled)                 (unscaled)
Objective...............:  -4.8055382997011273e-02   -4.8055382997011273e-02
Dual infeasibility......:   1.0557874019490043e-13    1.0557874019490043e-13
Constraint violation....:   2.6498253896365962e-12    2.6498253896365962e-12
Complementarity.........:   2.5059036924068151e-09    2.5059036924068151e-09
Overall NLP error.......:   2.5059036924068151e-09    2.5059036924068151e-09

Number of objective function evaluations              = 21
Number of objective gradient evaluations              = 21
Number of constraint evaluations                      = 21
Number of constraint Jacobian evaluations             = 21
Number of Lagrangian Hessian evaluations              = 20
Number of KKT factorizations                          = 21
Number of KKT backsolves                              = 41

Total wall secs in initialization                     =  0.016 s
Total wall secs in linear solver                      =  0.078 s
Total wall secs in NLP function evaluations           =  0.011 s
Total wall secs in solver (w/o init./fun./lin. alg.)  =  0.111 s
Total wall secs                                       =  0.216 s

EXIT: Optimal Solution Found (tol = 1.0e-08).